Supreme Court justice blasts pro-ICE ruling

Sotomayor cites Fourth Amendment in dissent

By: Terry Collins
USA Today

..... Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the Trump administration's operation of the Los Angles immigration raids, vowing not to stand idly by while the United States "constitutional freedoms are lost."
..... On September 8, [2025] the Supreme Court lifted a restraining order from a federal judge in Los Angeles who had restricted immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from conducting stops without reasonable suspicion.
..... In July, [2025] U.S. District Judge Maame Frimpong of the Central District of California said the government can't rely solely on the person's race, the language they speak, the work they perform and whether they're at a particular location.
..... However, the September 8 [2025] reverse by the Supreme Court's mostly conservative majority gave the Trump administration another victory, as Sotomayor condemned the vote.
..... "That decision is yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket," Sotomayor wrote in a blistering 21-page dissent. "We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job.
..... Sotomayor called the order "unconscionable by irreconcilable with our nation's constitutional guarantees."
..... The justices, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, ripped her high court conservative colleagues and the government over the ruling. Sotomayor declared that all Latinos, whether they are U.S. citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away form work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents; satisfaction.
..... In June, [2025] the Trump administration ramped up immigration raids across California by broadening its scope form only those with criminal records to anyone in the United States without proper authorization.
..... The crackdown ignited protests, prompting Trump to call in the National Guard and eventually the Marie's to diffuse the outrage.

Sotomayor takes exception to Kavanaugh's explanation

..... Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who agreed with Trump administration, said in his concurrent that the District Court overreached in limiting ICE's authority to briefly stop people and ask them about their mitigation status.
..... "To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court's case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be ;relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors," Kavanaugyh said.
..... He added, "Immigration stops based on resonance suspicion of illegal presence have been an important component of US mitigation enforcement for decades, across several presidential administrations."
..... Sotomaryor took exception to Kavanaugh's comments. She said ICE agents are not simply just questioning people they are seizing people by using firearms and physical violence.
..... Sotomayor added that the Fourth Amendment, which is meant to protect "every individual's constitutional rights" from search and seizure, might be in jeopardy.
..... "the Fourth Amendment protects every individual's constitutional right to be "free form arbitrary interference by law officers,' " Sotomayor said. "After today, [09/08/2025] that may no longer be true for those wh9o happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little."

..... Contributing: Maureen Groppe, USA Today

HOME